Firstly some development on the NOC from the state government (please see the clipping below) which may no longer be required.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Monday, July 29, 2013
Accreditation: The New Trend in School Improvement
For hundreds of years there have
been varying philosophies about education, based on various models of
study. In modern times, parents, students, and educators continue to
explore the different philosophies on education and how they impact
learning. While each education philosophy has its own belief in the
driving forces behind it, the issue of provision of education quality
exists in the wake of the recent globalization. Numerous education
systems exist throughout the world; however, education providers have
not been able to develop a consensus on what to teach, what teaching
methodologies they should adopt and how the examinations should be
assessed. The question that arises is how the quality of education can
be assured when numerous education systems exist across the world.
There are numerous regional
accreditation agencies and bodies across the world that assess the
education providers of their specific regions on different factors.
They evaluate an educational institution based on the years of education
students acquire and how many of them pass their exams. The problems
that arise is since these exams are not similar in different countries,
they do not really allow an agency to evaluate the quality of education
imparted to the students. The quality of education cannot be assured
because the academic programs around the world are not the same and
cannot be compared to each other.
To standardize the quality of
education globally and accredit education providers on an international
scale, organizations like IAO have developed accreditation standards
that are both regionally and internationally recognized and accepted.
Traditional and Non-Traditional
education providers today have realized the importance of establishing
global educational standards through international accreditation, adding
tremendous value to the brand name of their establishment. In this
regard, to prove the legitimacy of such organizations, University of
Bangalore recently received Candidacy Status from IAO, which is a major
achievement for the education sector of India. It will encourage reputed
education providers to get internationally accredited and recognized
for providing quality education. Not only this, this accreditation will
offer international recognition to all its stakeholders, a factor
considered very important by students and university placement programs
around the world.
With IAO’s international
accreditation, education can reach out across geographic boundaries and
has greater appeal for foreign students. Graduates of internationally
accredited universities find it much easier to pursue careers in foreign
countries because their academic credentials are accepted worldwide.
This quality of international accreditation plays a vital role in career
development for students and increases the value of international
accreditation for students.
Classroom Displays
Classroom displays are an
integral part of a classroom. They help children feel valued and
involved. Their artwork is often displayed on the walls but needs
framing appropriately. Classroom displays can help. We stock a huge
number of classroom display products, from display letters to banners,
borders and trimmers, all designed to offer you choice. Classroom
displays are critical to your success.
School bulletin boards and Classroom Displays can
be updated as often as you like – some themes will obviously last
longer than others. Children are very engaged in their classroom
displays and will no doubt have strong views as to what should, or
should not, be included. It is a simple way and impactful way to share
information and update others on the work going on in your classroom.
Schools have a number of communal areas which can create a welcoming and
high impact first impression when classroom display products are used
effectively. The atmosphere of an area can be changed almost instantly.
There are a number of free
resources available on the web which can help you with ideas for what to
put up in your displays. Sites such as Classroom Displayhave a huge selection of great value and high quality resources which can be used again and again.
classfSchool Improvement
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Cut , Copy , Paste
This article considers how teachers can deal with the culture of plagiarism.
Plagiarism
– the intentional or unintentional use of material from another source
without acknowledgment – has become a “rot” that has set into Indian
society, especially into the educational system. While this happens more
often than not because of the ease of the process of copy-pasting from
the Internet,
or due to lack to time, or because it is just easier to use someone
else’s work than spend time and energy creating your own, it is also
because children often just don’t realise that it is not the right thing
to do.
You
open the first project file, slick and sharp in its clear plastic cover
and blue spine, with a beautifully illustrated cover. “This child has
certainly taken a lot of trouble over her work!” you think. You sit back
and begin to read, expecting the content to live up to the promise of
the packaging. And indeed it does. The sentences indicate a fluency that
amazes you, the ideas expressed with clarity and elegance. You’re
impressed. Paragraph after paragraph of perfectly formed ideas, building
an argument that wins the day. You give the project top marks, then
turn to check the name on the cover as you enter the marks into your
register. Hmm…strange, this child never showed this much potential
before.
On a hunch, you type a random paragraph from this project into the
Google search bar on your computer screen and voila! an entire paper on
precisely the topic you had assigned. With a few changes here and there,
this is the project you had just graded, word for word.
Such a scenario is becoming increasingly common, with a number of children in urban schools having easy access to readily packaged information on the Internet. It’s easy to copy and paste text, often images as well, and simply turn it as your own work, most often, with no acknowledgments made. Sometimes, a sloppily put together list of web sites (with incomplete addresses) serves as a reference list but it is never clear what extent of information was just lifted straight off those sites and how much of the paper is the student’s own analysis or insight. Of course, copying is not restricted to material off the Net; it can just as easily (though with slightly more labour) be done from a book in the library, a report taken from a family member or friend, or a project submitted by another child in another school.
Plagiarism – the intentional or unintentional usage of material from another source without acknowledgment – has become what one blogger (“Sunil”) calls a “rot” that has set into Indian society, especially into the educational system. Students at all levels think nothing of using ideas and words without citing the source, often not even noting it for their own records. While this happens more often than not because of the ease of the process of copy-pasting from the Internet, or due to lack to time, or because it is just easier to use someone else’s work than spend time and energy creating your own, it is also because children often just don’t realise that it is not the right thing to do. No one has sat them down and explained what intellectual and academic honesty mean.
Such a scenario is becoming increasingly common, with a number of children in urban schools having easy access to readily packaged information on the Internet. It’s easy to copy and paste text, often images as well, and simply turn it as your own work, most often, with no acknowledgments made. Sometimes, a sloppily put together list of web sites (with incomplete addresses) serves as a reference list but it is never clear what extent of information was just lifted straight off those sites and how much of the paper is the student’s own analysis or insight. Of course, copying is not restricted to material off the Net; it can just as easily (though with slightly more labour) be done from a book in the library, a report taken from a family member or friend, or a project submitted by another child in another school.
Plagiarism – the intentional or unintentional usage of material from another source without acknowledgment – has become what one blogger (“Sunil”) calls a “rot” that has set into Indian society, especially into the educational system. Students at all levels think nothing of using ideas and words without citing the source, often not even noting it for their own records. While this happens more often than not because of the ease of the process of copy-pasting from the Internet, or due to lack to time, or because it is just easier to use someone else’s work than spend time and energy creating your own, it is also because children often just don’t realise that it is not the right thing to do. No one has sat them down and explained what intellectual and academic honesty mean.
We cannot get away from the Internet. Nor can we escape the fact that
there’s so much formation around us; students today have an amazing
array of sources to choose from when they begin exploring a topic. They
are exposed to a variety of perspectives as well, and if they choose to,
they can draw from a whole range of sources, conventional (printed
reference sources, subject experts) and unconventional (talk radio,
internet sources such as blogs as well as reference sites such as
Wikipedia). What we need to ensure is that they understand the fine line
between drawing upon other people’s work to build their own ideas, and
simply presenting a ready-made analysis as their own.
Plagiarism can be unintentional, as in when you forget to cite a
source or use material without complete information on the source but do
not actually claim it is your own. This is more a matter of
intellectual sloppiness than dishonesty, and can be corrected by
communicating clear instructions on how to handle references and
academic citation conventions. It may help for teachers to provide a
style sheet for references and citations, and to give examples of where
and how source material needs to be acknowledged. Students may not
realise that it is important to cite sources even when they do not
reproduce material verbatim. The process of paraphrasing in a way makes
it their own. They need to understand that the author owns the idea just
as much she/he owns the words in which the idea is expressed.
Intentional plagiarism is of ourse a clearer case of dishonesty and
is perhaps tackled more easily. But here too, a policy must be laid down
and standards set for citing sources and giving credit not only for
quoting verbatim but for ideas as well. It is not enough to simply state
that plagiarism will be punished but to discuss in the class what
exactly constitutes plagiarism.
Some teachers believe that insisting on handwritten assignments to
some extent discourages students from copying outright – and even if
they do copy word for word, the act of writing it out ensures that some
amount of learning or internalisation has taken place. Printed
assignments on the other hand could be just cut-copy-paste jobs from a
variety of web sites, sometimes not even read through carefully. One
teacher cites the case of a student who turned in a printed paper that
was clearly a copy-paste job, with even the web address still on the top
of the page!
There are more complex issues concerning the copy-paste culture and
the various grades of plagiarism. Idea theft – where an idea has been
discussed by someone informally and then appropriated and presented by
another – is difficult to identify and even more difficult to prove.
There are cases where parents put together material for their children
to use, sometimes going so far as to have projects commissioned by
experts. The school system is not entirely blameless in this area. Often
projects are assigned that are much beyond the ability of a single
student, both in terms of their intellectual demands and sheer physical
scope. Parents are expected to help, not just with advice and feedback,
but with the actual putting together of the project. So from a very
early age children get used to the fact of depending on others for their
work, often without giving explicit credit or acknowledgment for these
inputs.
A teacher can help set ethical standards by discussion and by
practice early on in a child’s school career. Even in primary school
projects, children can be encouraged to talk about how they did a
project and who helped them with it, without penalising them for taking
help. The point to be emphasised is that we all need help with our work
and it is important to give credit to those who help us – or to the
sources where the help comes from, if it is not a particular person.
Asking simple questions like “Where did you get this idea?” and “Did
your mother/father help you with this?” in a climate that is not
threatening but simply interested, will encourage children to share the
process of their learning and to understand that it’s okay to ask for
and take help – and that it’s not only okay, but essential to say so.
In higher classes, teachers need to not only insist on clear
documentation of project work but also lead by example in talking about
where they access information and where certain ideas have come from in
their own lectures and notes. Plenty of examples exist in the scientific
and academic literature of the consequences of plagiarism and
intellectual theft, and it might be worthwhile to share some of these,
so that children understand the larger issues that could stem from a
simple copypaste activity. Teachers need to emphasize that while the Net
is a valuable and convenient source of information, overdependence on
it as a source of information can also lead to a certain intellectual
laziness – apart from the fact that a Google search can often end up
being like a needle-in-a-haystack exercise unless you know where and how
to look, and what to look for!
At the school level, it’s important that there is a uniform and
accepted policy in place to deal with plagiarism, and that this is
widely disseminated to staff, students and parents.
The ease with which images, text and even sound can be copied,
manipulated and reworked to create new products out of bits of old ones
leads to a situation where no one recognises where the idea (or set of
ideas) came from in the first place. For instance, the whole ‘re-mix’
revolution is based on the idea of taking an old thing and changing it.
So where does ownership lie? To what extent can the ‘new’ form be
claimed as a completely original idea? Is this plagiarism or simply
creative imitation? And then there are cases of literary successes who
then turn out to be merely skilful copiers who stitch together stories
from a variety of sources and package it as something new.
Surrounded by a popular culture where copying is the norm, where
footnotes and cumbersome reference lists are considered not only passé
but redundant, children often find it difficult to recognise, let alone
respect, ethical boundaries. School is the place where these ethics have
to be reclaimed. After all, if scholarship is about anything, it is
about ideas and their growth. And unless we teach children to respect
other people’s ideas and words, they will never learn to recognise and
then value originality.
The concept of plagiarism can be discussed in a variety of ways, and
it has ramifications beyond copied projects. Students in high school
could be encouraged to think about some of these issues. For instance,
are there ideas that have no owners, ideas that are part of a common
intellectual realm that exists outside of individual thought?
How can we distinguish between ‘common knowledge’ and individually
generated ideas? Is copyright and ownership of intellectual property
only a way of limiting the spread of ideas and knowledge? You could
discuss the implications of patenting and bring up issues such as the
differences between patenting products and processes. What relationship
does plagiarism and copying have with the whole issue of patenting?
How can teachers spot plagiarism?
Here are some things to look out for.
- Unusual sophistication in ideas or their articulation
- A last minute submission of exceptional quality
- Lack of any documentation in the text or no references in a complex assignment
- Wide variation in style within a document
- The cropping up of sudden names or isolated markers without explanation
- The appearance of similar blocks of text in more than one student’s project
How do teachers address the situation?
- Work through a project with the entire class: bring in a set of reference texts and ask the class, in groups, to arrive at a synthesis which draws from these texts. In the process show them how to cite and refer, what constitutes acceptable paraphrasing, etc.
- Arrive at an assessment method that takes into account the process of working on a project as well as the product-this will then address issues such as how well and clearly references have been used and cited, how much originality has been applied, etc.
- Assign short summarising and critiquing exercises that build skills in precis writing that goes beyond just drawing out selected sentences verbatim from a source text.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Can Concentration Really Improve Memory?
Expert answers the big question,
can concentration improve memory? The basic memory mechanics exposes the
power of concentration to improve memory. You can combine yoga with the
basic memory mechanics to concentrate and focus to enhance encoding
information in the brain. We’re a group of navigation engineers that
take pride in navigating readers to the Correct Knowledge to obliterate
harsh learning curves. We know from experience that knowledge is not
power, but the correct use of knowledge is power. This article is about
making the correct choices to improve memory and prevent from traveling
down long lost dreary roads, stumbling into rattle snake pits and the
lion’s dens.
Can concentration improve memory?
Yes, concentrating can increase the amount of information encoded in
the brain. Concentration enhances the basic memory mechanics by creating
a healthy, vibrant and energetic brain. Most of my readers want to add
additional skills to enhanced brain encoding methods and functionalities
of the brain.Combining basic memory mechanics and concentrating creates
the perfect chemistry. You are deeply encoding information in the
brain, which makes recalling important and relevant information faster.
First I highly recommend
practicing the basic memory mechanics, which are enough: (1) water-10
glasses per day (2) sleep-6-8 hours per day (3) consumption of memory
foods, vegetables and fruits (4) consumption of memory
vitamin-supplements with memory foods, because vitamins cannot
assimilate and digest alone.
Secondly practice proven methods that work for you.
Thirdly you can practice
additional skills to increase encoding in the brain. Yes, concentration
can improve memory when your brain is healthy and fit. You should always
practice the basic memory mechanics and brain encoding methods; then
add concentration skills. Believe me it requires excellent concentration
and focus to practice in sequence and to create healthy learning
habits.
Yoga is the “Master” of
meditating, focusing and concentrating, which can: (1) increase
concentration to improve memory, as well as (2) enhance encoding
information in the brain. There are many types of Yoga’s, which are
known to connect the mind; body and soul. Maybe you are still wondering,
“How can concentration improve memory?” Any healthy brain can add
additional skill concentration skills that can enhance encoding
information in the brain.
Most of my readers want to know,
“How concentration improves memory?” I intend to answer this question
with accuracy, definition and precision. Encoding information in the
brain is a simple process that grows and builds from practicing a proven
process that healthily position and prepares the brain to encode as
well as enhance amount of information the brain encodes.
Basic Memory Mechanics
The “Basic Memory Mechanics” is
simple a way of caring for the brain, which can make the brain care for
you. This process of caring creates a healthy vibrant and energetic
brain. Through experience, wisdom, knowledge and understanding you can
rely on the basic memory mechanics to keep you on track, which is: (1)
sleeping 6-8 hour per day, (2) consuming 10 glasses of water daily, (3)
consuming memory foods daily, and (4) consuming memory vitamins with
your memory foods. The basic memory mechanics is practiced process that
creates a healthy, ready and prepared brain. The brain is boosted,
energized, stimulated, and ready to practice the brain encoding methods
that work for you.
Brain Encoding Methods
A healthy brain is the key to
encoding information in the brain as well as enhancing amount of
information encoded in the brain. You’re healthy, energetic and
stimulated brain can encode important and relevant information much
better. Most of my readers are experts at practicing the basic memory
mechanics and proven encoding methods. Beginners should practice 3
proven encoding methods per month, 3 times per week for 2 hours and for
6-12 months, which is highly recommended. I many of my readers are known
to practice 5-7 encoding methods, however I realize that some have been
practicing encoding methods from as early as Pre-K and Kindergarten,
which mean that encoding may be deeply rooted learning habits. Therefore
practicing numerous encoding methods may vary depending on the amount
of encoding experience you may have.
Additional Skills
Practicing the following in sequence can benefit you immensely:
(1) basic memory mechanics
(2) proven encoding methods that work for you
(3) Adding additional skills to
enhance brain encoding methods, which can increase amount of information
brain encodes. Your brain muscle should be positioned, ready and
prepared to practice additional skills to enhance encoding information
in the brain.
Can concentration improve memory?
You have a blue print that you can utilize to healthily add skills to
enhance brain encoding through proper focus and concentration.
Thursday, July 25, 2013
The Importance of Computer and Internet Access at Home
The internet is something most of
us take for granted. We look up recipes, stay connected to friends and
family, and research many different topics. More and more devices such
as phones, e-readers, and MP3 players connect
to the internet. And many students use the internet on a regular basis to do research for papers and other school assignments. In addition to the internet, many students use programs such as word processing programs, drawing programs and photo shop programs.
to the internet. And many students use the internet on a regular basis to do research for papers and other school assignments. In addition to the internet, many students use programs such as word processing programs, drawing programs and photo shop programs.
It should be reassuring that more
and more students are using the computer. That is until you look at
statistics in the states that perform worst where education is
concerned. Recent statistics out of Louisiana, which routinely ranks
near the bottom in terms of education and graduation rates, show that
between 32 to 40 percent of students do not have access to computers or
internet at home.
For a whole generation of parents
and grandparents that number may not seem too alarming, after all, they
managed to go to school, even to college and advanced degrees without
internet access. But the world has changed. In years past, one expense
that many parents incurred early in their child’s life was the purchase
of an encyclopedia set. As the computer and internet became a
household fixture, many families replaced the purchase of encyclopedias
with internet access. It could be argued that students with computer
and internet access at home have an unfair advantage over students who
do not have that access.
Consider the student who does
have internet access at home. With a five page report due, that student
sits in their own home, pulls up the internet on the computer, and at
their fingertips have thousands of sources from which to gather
information. After collecting his or her data, this student types in
the report, giving little care to the correct spelling or grammar, since
both of those are easy enough to fix with an adequate word processing
program. Finally, the corrected research paper is printed out and
tucked into a folder to be turned in.
In comparison the student who
does not have computer and internet access at home has to find a source
to gather information from for the paper. The library might be a good
source for that, but first the student must secure a ride to the
library. If that student is lucky, she can then use library resources.
This is a much slower process, requiring more time. Some students
might then wait in line for computer time at the library, with hopes of
getting time to enter their report and print it out. However, computer
resources at the library are limited, and not everyone will have the
time or opportunity to type in their report. This means that this
student will then spend additional time hand-writing the report. In
addition, this student will not have the benefit of grammar and spell
checker software.
The contrast between the time
spend for each of these students to complete the same report is
startling. The depth of research will not be equal for these two
students, nor will the grammatical and spelling accuracy. This puts the
student without computer and internet access at a decided disadvantage
before the paper is even graded. Because of those disadvantages, the
technologically challenged student may fall behind simply because it
takes more time to complete assignments, and that additional time spent
will take time away from the study of other subjects.
Over the course of a student’s
elementary, middle and high school years this disadvantage will probably
be cumulative and may also lead to lower self-esteem, as grades may
slip, or at best require more work, and longer hours to remain
competitive with other students who have technological advantages such
as home computer and internet access.
In a time when we are blaming teachers for poor performance, and in states that score low in academics, maybe
one way to improve the standing of students and the states in general is to look at the gap between the students who have home computer and internet access and those who do not. It is beyond the scope of this writing to suggest a solution to this dilemma, however it is interesting to consider that home computer and internet access might contribute to improved grades, and ultimately high academic performance within a state.
one way to improve the standing of students and the states in general is to look at the gap between the students who have home computer and internet access and those who do not. It is beyond the scope of this writing to suggest a solution to this dilemma, however it is interesting to consider that home computer and internet access might contribute to improved grades, and ultimately high academic performance within a state.
Teach the Future, Foster Innovation
The Common Core State Standards, along with the recently released
Next Generation Science Standards, have educators mobilized, even if
uneasy. Many are hopeful these rigorous new standards will fix whatever
is wrong with American education and boost U.S. standing in
international comparisons. Why shouldn’t U.S. students be scoring at the
top on these tests, along with Singapore and Finland?
I’ve just returned from a meeting in Singapore, whose education
leaders meet frequently to take stock and look ahead, and I was
interested in what might be on their minds. Are they resting on their
laurels, content that their national investment in education has paid
off—perhaps even hesitant to make any changes to what appears to be
working so well?
To the contrary, I found them uninterested in the status quo,
eager to invest in new approaches, and concerned to identify objectives
that are not being met. A current major concern, and the focus of the
meeting I attended, is developing curricula that will foster innovative
thinking in students, an attribute the country’s leaders see as critical
to 21st-century success, and one, by the way, that international
assessments have yet to tap.
Singapore’s leaders are not at all confident that the
international assessments they participate in are measuring what’s most
important for students to learn. What curricula have we instituted in
the United States, I was asked, to develop creativity and innovative
thinking in American students?
I had to respond that this is not a current priority in U.S.
classrooms. A number of well-regarded educational thinkers and writers, I
explained, embrace these objectives, arguing for the importance of
developing students who are flexible, generative thinkers ready to
address the yet-unknown issues that will confront their generation. But
these writers are not the individuals in positions to mandate curricula
on any broad scale in the nation’s schools.
Those who do have a say in what is taught and how in U.S.
schoolrooms—from district superintendents to classroom teachers—are
preoccupied with other concerns at the moment. The new, now widely
adopted common standards are just that—standards stipulating what
students are to have mastered at each grade level.
How teachers are to teach the material and ensure their students
meet the standards is left to local discretion, with guidance for
individual teachers scarce, at best. Unsurprisingly, anxieties about
measuring up to new expectations are running high.
With their plates full, U.S. teachers are unlikely to find time to
nurture attributes such as creativity, or other qualities that we don’t
yet know how to measure well or that don’t enter into student- or
teacher-performance evaluations. So, while high-level talk continues
about the need to equip students with “21st-century skills,” attention
on the ground is focused on improving students’ performance on
more-rigorous standardized assessments that will bolster their
international rankings.
The problem is that these international assessments represent the
past and present, not the future. It’s countries like Singapore that are
hard at work looking at what could be, not what is, with respect to
educating their youths. They have already moved beyond mere talk of
21st-century skills to better identify just what these skills are and,
most important of all, how to foster them.
Is it possible, then, that a decade or two from now the United
States will find itself left behind, having devoted its resources to
boosting student performance on the kinds of tests that the most
educationally forward-thinking countries will have replaced?
It needn’t be so. The United States has long been known as a
center of innovation. Why not in education, where we might expect
innovation to be both central to practice and fostered in the next
generation? Something to move us in this direction might be attention to
a missing voice among the stakeholders in the debates on standards:
that of students themselves.
"[I]nternational assessments represent the past and present, not the future."
What is going to motivate students to invest the greater
effort required to achieve the new, more rigorous standards? In the end,
teachers can only successfully teach students what they are willing to
learn.
I recently asked urban public middle school students in three
different classrooms to write a letter describing their ideal school to
potential applicants. A few students treated the assignment as an
opportunity to fantasize, describing amenities such as locker rooms
equipped with Jacuzzis. These were the exception, however.
The surprise, given the open-ended nature of the assignment, was
how frequently two themes appeared: One was student choice in what they
would study. The other was time to pursue their interests. A 6th grader,
for example, described a school in which “[students] are put in
learning groups with people whose interests are very much like their
own. ... Because of this curriculum, students realize their interests,
which helps later when they begin their careers.”
Learning groups formed around individual interests? An intriguing
idea worthy of serious consideration, but how does it happen to occur to
a 12-year-old?
Surprisingly, she was not alone, although students expressed their
ideas in different ways. Some had a rhetorical flair for the persuasive
in describing the mission of this ideal school in which students have a
say in defining the curriculum: “We help students reach their goals,”
one wrote. “We’re here to pursue their dreams,” wrote another.
Like most adolescents, these students have begun to envision who
they might become and would like to see the way from here to there.
Several echoed this idea in making the case for choice: “Adults make
almost all their choices for themselves, so one of our main goals is to
incorporate personal choices into our school.”
Another said the school would “teach students to be responsible
and to make their own decisions,” adding that “most schools don’t agree”
with this philosophy.
Were schools to allow students the space to invest in their
own intellectual interests, only the luckiest would develop a passion
strong enough to shape who they become. Not all tinkerers in the family
garage become Steve Jobs. But many could have the chance to forge
concepts of themselves as specialists in something, whatever it might
be. It is in such sustained investment in problems of their own
choosing, rather than only in a packed-full, standards-dictated
curriculum, that the seeds of innovation lie.
The education and cultural critic Neil Postman characterized
education as “the central institution through which the young may find
reasons for continuing to educate themselves.” This is the ultimate goal
if we seek to educate for the future.
Although adolescents’ visions of a future are at best vague, their
typical school experience does little to make these clearer. The
implicit message their history classes convey is that learning about the
past takes precedence over contemplating the present or future. Why not
teach the future?
Few classrooms engage students in significant debate of serious
issues of the day, arguably the best practice to prepare them to address
the issues of the future, and to develop their identities as citizens
with the capability and responsibility to address these issues.
America’s investment in education could start to take a different
direction, if we summon the vision and the will to look to the future
and to invest generously and wisely in it. Americans need not defer to
other nations to take the lead in educational innovation, nor should we
fail to nurture a new generation of innovators.
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Learning Tips for Multiple Intelligences
We learn through all of the
intelligence styles, but we have certain learning preferences that are
stronger than others. Choose strategies that support your student’s
strongest learning preference when helping them with homework or
studying.
For Verbal/Linguistic Learners
These learners learn by saying,
hearing and seeing words. They can easily memorize names, dates, places
and trivia. To help verbal/linguistic learners:
-Use descriptive language
-Have them study by reading, writing, telling stories, playing word games and working with jokes and riddles
-They are good at creating imaginary worlds
-Create crossword puzzles for practice at www.puzzlemaker.com
For Logical/Mathematical Learners
These learners are adept at
categorizing, classifying and working with abstract patterns and
relationships. They work well with reasoning, numbers, abstractions,
logic, problem-solving and moving from the concrete to the abstract.
-Compare and contrast ideas
-Create a timeline
-Classify concepts/objects/materials
-Read or design maps
-Use a Venn diagram to explain…
-Teach using technology
For Bodily/Kinesthetic Learners
The brain’s motor cortex, which
controls bodily motion, is the key to the intelligence of
bodily/kinesthetic learners. These learners process knowledge through
bodily sensations and need to touch, move and interact with space.
-Create hands-on projects
-Conduct hands-on experiments
-Create human sculptures to illustrate situations
-Reenact great moments from history
-Make task or puzzle cards for…
For Visual/Spatial Learners
Visual/spatial learners rely on
their sense of sight and the ability to visualize an object. They create
-Make a visual organizer or memory model of the material being learned
-Graph the results of a survey or a course of study
-Create posters or flyers
-Create collages
-Draw maps
-Color-code the process of…
For Musical/Rhythmic Learners
Musical/rhythmic learners
recognize tonal patterns. For optimal learning, suggest that they hum or
sing the information they want to grasp or have them move their bodies
while they study.
-Create “raps” (key dates, math and poems) or write new lyrics to a song so that it explains…
-Identify social issues through lyrics
-Analyze different historical periods through their music
-Make up sounds for different math operations or processes
-Use music to enhance the learning of…
For Interpersonal Learners
Person-to-person relationships and communication are necessary for interpersonal learners. They study and work best with others.
-Analyze the relationships in a story
-Review material/concepts/books orally
-Discuss/debate controversial issues
-Find relationships between objects, cultures and situations
-Role-play a conversation with an important historical figure
-Solve complex word problems in a group
-Peer Tutor the subject being learned
For Intrapersonal Learners
Almost the exact opposite of
interpersonal learners, intrapersonal learners thrive when working
alone. Self-paced instruction and individualized projects work best with
these students. Suggest that intrapersonal learners keep a daily
journal, as their thoughts are directed inward. They have a great degree
of self-understanding and they rely deeply on their instincts.
-Keep a journal to demonstrate learning
-Analyze historical personalities
-Imagine being a character in
history, a scientist discovering a cure or a mathematician working on a
theory and describe or write about what you imagine to demonstrate
learning
For Naturalist Learners
Naturalist learners observe and
understand the organized patterns in the natural world. Provide them
with visualization activities and hands-on activities that are based on
nature. Bring the outdoors into their learning environment whenever
possible. Study in ways that call on the naturalist learner’s abilities
to measure, map and chart observations of plants and animals.
-Sort and classify content in relation to the natural world
-Interact with nature through field trips
-Encourage learning in natural surroundings
-Categorize facts about…
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Effective learning patterns for successful Students
Always keep one thing in mind – “Good Leaders are Good Readers”.
To become a successful student, you must have good study routine.
Successful kids apply many good habits to all their classes. Read about
some excellent study routine and try to develop the study pattern that
you do not comprise.
Superior study practice for booming kids:
- Try not to read too much at a time: If you attempt to study to a larger extent at a time, you will get exhausted and your schoolwork will not be very effective. Distribute your work to be done in short periods. Taking short breaks will bring back your mind power.
- Map specific time period for studying: Study time is any time that you do something related to schoolwork such as completing some assignments, or preparing for an exam etc. Being punctual in life is very important. Schedule specific times throughout the day for your learning time.
- Study at the same times each day: If you can try to study at the specific time daily, set up a routine that becomes a regular habit of your life, such as eating or sleeping. When the scheduled time arrives on the day, you will be mentally prepared to begin studying.
- Set objectives for your study hours: Goals help you stay focused and observe your improvement. Only sitting down for study has slightly less value. You must be clear about what you want to achieve during your study times.
- Begin to study at the scheduled time: Can you delay your beginning time for study because you do not like an assignment or think it is very complicated. Any holdup in studying is called “leaving it for later.” If you leave things for later for whatever reason, you will find it more difficult to get things done when you need to do them. You may have to hurry to make up for the time lost at the beginning, which can result in careless work and errors.
- Work first on assignment which is most difficult: Your most difficult assignment will require the most effort. Start with the most difficult assignment since at start you have the most mental energy.
- Review your notes before every assignment: The re-analysis of your notes can help you make sure you are performing properly on the assignment. Also, your notes may include information that can help you complete the assignment in effective way.
- Keep concentrated during your hours of study: Two problems may occur if someone calls you during your study times. First, interruption to your work. And not so easy to pick up the thread of what you were doing previously. Second, the other person can talk about things that can distract you from what you need to do. Simple ideas - turn off your cell phone, switch off your TV and shut the doors during your study times.
- Don’t hesitate for friends help with a difficult assignment: This is a case where “two heads are better than one.” You can solve out problems effectively if you work in collaboration with your friends.
- Review your work over the weekend: Of course, weekend should be a time for entertainment. But there must be some time to review your previous work. This will help you be ready to start on Monday morning when another school week begins.
These are some of the study
habits that can help you in improving your learning skills and
knowledge. Make sure they are your learning practice.
Monday, July 22, 2013
Social Networking : It Belongs In The Classroom
Perhaps
the title of this post is bold, but I strongly believe in the use of
social media and social networking (including, but not limited to, Twitter, YouTube, Skype, Scoop.it
etc.) in the classroom to promote learning. I recognize that social
media and social networking are nothing more than another tool in a pool
of options available to us as teachers. However, social media and
social networking allow teachers to provide students with a learning
experience that is not possible within the confines of their own
classroom walls.
There are many arguments for and against the use of social media in the classroom. Lederer (2012) states that the pros of social media in the classroom include fostering collaboration and discussion, creating meaningful dialogue to share ideas, boost student interaction and prepare students for successful employment. Alternatively she discusses how social media can be a distraction, increase opportunities for cyber bullying and discourage face-to-face communication. Although I respect her arguments against social media, I do not fully agree with them.
Digital Citizenship is one of the competencies outlined by Alberta Education in the “Framework for Student Learning: Competencies for Engaged Thinkers and Ethical Citizens with an Entrepreneurial Spirit” (Alberta Education, 2011). A goal of the digital citizenship competency is to “help [students] find information, communicate with others, solve problems and make decisions” (Alberta Education, 2011). The point of integrating social media into the classroom is to promote student understanding of the benefit of it’s use. Social media can be used to teach students about exercising integrity while interacting with others online. If we are to genuinely teach our students about digital citizenship, we must use technology to do so. Discussing the online world that exists, and that our students are already involved in, without allowing them to engage in real world applications does not promote learning.
Bullying has been a reality in our schools for years and with the influx of technology use, cyber bullying is on the rise and becoming a more pertinent issue. Teaching our students about their digital footprint and how to interact with individuals online in a professional manner will help to decrease cyber bullying. Many students don’t understand that what they do online is tracked throughout their life and follows them into their adult life; this is not like a nasty note passed around a classroom that can easily be destroyed. If we discuss, with students, the implications of their actions this will help to deter students from making poor choices. The key to success is early education, we cannot begin this in high school, but need to begin in elementary. If we start educating our students at younger ages, they will grow up with an understanding of the intricacies of the Internet and in the older grades we can continue the discussion of digital citizenship, but with a focus on their future and not on cleaning up, or burying, their past.
To discuss Lederer’s (2012) argument pertaining to the affect social media has on face-to-face communication, I believe that it could actually increase face-to-face interaction if this is done properly. Sawmiller (2010) discusses the way blogging, a form of social media, gives silent students a voice. I believe that as students engage with one another online, they will become more comfortable in their classroom environment and this will transfer directly into the face-to-face classroom. It is also important that the teacher engages students in conversations in the classroom, not just online. Combining these forms of interaction will increase the positive learning community in the classroom and promote student learning. As with anything there are drawbacks, however with careful planning and implementation negatives can be reduced to provide students with a fantastic opportunity to learn.
Before exposing your students to social media, I recommend you get involved yourself, so that you can model exceptional practice to your students. I have personally had a fantastic experience with Twitter since becoming active in PSI. Below is a selection from a previous post, “Twitter: A Social Media Platform that Promotes Collaboration & Learning by Teachers & Students”:
“What I didn’t see coming, was the pure enjoyment and excitement I would find in reading other professionals posts, developing my Personal Learning Network (PLN) and composing my own relevant educational tweets. I couldn’t believe the vast number of resources that are available on Twitter; it is absolutely wonderful! In the past six weeks I have enjoyed and learned a lot through this simple social media platform and made connections with some extremely interesting professionals. The importance of collaboration is one of the key lessons I have taken away thus far from my Education degree; there are few ways easier to collaborate with professionals worldwide, than through Twitter.”
What I have learned from my personal experiences with Twitter is directly transferrable to the classroom and our students. Before you resist the use of social media in the classroom, take the time to learn it yourself and you will see the wonderful learning tool it can be for your and your students.
References
Alberta Education. (2011). Framework for student learning: Competencies for engaged thinkers and ethical citizens with an entrepreneurial spirit. Retrieved on July 8,2013 from http://education.alberta.ca/media/6581166/framework.pdf
Lederer, K. (2012). Pros and cons of social media in the classroom. Retrieved on July 10, 2013 from http://ht.ly/8GiRd
Sawmiller, A. (2010). Classroom Blogging: What Is the Role in Science Learning?. Clearing House: A Journal Of Educational Strategies, Issues And Ideas, 83(2),44-48.
There are many arguments for and against the use of social media in the classroom. Lederer (2012) states that the pros of social media in the classroom include fostering collaboration and discussion, creating meaningful dialogue to share ideas, boost student interaction and prepare students for successful employment. Alternatively she discusses how social media can be a distraction, increase opportunities for cyber bullying and discourage face-to-face communication. Although I respect her arguments against social media, I do not fully agree with them.
Digital Citizenship is one of the competencies outlined by Alberta Education in the “Framework for Student Learning: Competencies for Engaged Thinkers and Ethical Citizens with an Entrepreneurial Spirit” (Alberta Education, 2011). A goal of the digital citizenship competency is to “help [students] find information, communicate with others, solve problems and make decisions” (Alberta Education, 2011). The point of integrating social media into the classroom is to promote student understanding of the benefit of it’s use. Social media can be used to teach students about exercising integrity while interacting with others online. If we are to genuinely teach our students about digital citizenship, we must use technology to do so. Discussing the online world that exists, and that our students are already involved in, without allowing them to engage in real world applications does not promote learning.
Bullying has been a reality in our schools for years and with the influx of technology use, cyber bullying is on the rise and becoming a more pertinent issue. Teaching our students about their digital footprint and how to interact with individuals online in a professional manner will help to decrease cyber bullying. Many students don’t understand that what they do online is tracked throughout their life and follows them into their adult life; this is not like a nasty note passed around a classroom that can easily be destroyed. If we discuss, with students, the implications of their actions this will help to deter students from making poor choices. The key to success is early education, we cannot begin this in high school, but need to begin in elementary. If we start educating our students at younger ages, they will grow up with an understanding of the intricacies of the Internet and in the older grades we can continue the discussion of digital citizenship, but with a focus on their future and not on cleaning up, or burying, their past.
To discuss Lederer’s (2012) argument pertaining to the affect social media has on face-to-face communication, I believe that it could actually increase face-to-face interaction if this is done properly. Sawmiller (2010) discusses the way blogging, a form of social media, gives silent students a voice. I believe that as students engage with one another online, they will become more comfortable in their classroom environment and this will transfer directly into the face-to-face classroom. It is also important that the teacher engages students in conversations in the classroom, not just online. Combining these forms of interaction will increase the positive learning community in the classroom and promote student learning. As with anything there are drawbacks, however with careful planning and implementation negatives can be reduced to provide students with a fantastic opportunity to learn.
Before exposing your students to social media, I recommend you get involved yourself, so that you can model exceptional practice to your students. I have personally had a fantastic experience with Twitter since becoming active in PSI. Below is a selection from a previous post, “Twitter: A Social Media Platform that Promotes Collaboration & Learning by Teachers & Students”:
“What I didn’t see coming, was the pure enjoyment and excitement I would find in reading other professionals posts, developing my Personal Learning Network (PLN) and composing my own relevant educational tweets. I couldn’t believe the vast number of resources that are available on Twitter; it is absolutely wonderful! In the past six weeks I have enjoyed and learned a lot through this simple social media platform and made connections with some extremely interesting professionals. The importance of collaboration is one of the key lessons I have taken away thus far from my Education degree; there are few ways easier to collaborate with professionals worldwide, than through Twitter.”
What I have learned from my personal experiences with Twitter is directly transferrable to the classroom and our students. Before you resist the use of social media in the classroom, take the time to learn it yourself and you will see the wonderful learning tool it can be for your and your students.
References
Alberta Education. (2011). Framework for student learning: Competencies for engaged thinkers and ethical citizens with an entrepreneurial spirit. Retrieved on July 8,2013 from http://education.alberta.ca/media/6581166/framework.pdf
Lederer, K. (2012). Pros and cons of social media in the classroom. Retrieved on July 10, 2013 from http://ht.ly/8GiRd
Sawmiller, A. (2010). Classroom Blogging: What Is the Role in Science Learning?. Clearing House: A Journal Of Educational Strategies, Issues And Ideas, 83(2),44-48.
Sunday, July 21, 2013
Top 20 behaviour strategies
As a quick reference point and a reminder of strategies, this Behaviour Matters lists the top 20 behaviour strategies to include in your toolbox of behaviour management techniques
Everyone has their own range of
strategies and styles of managing the behaviour of pupils in their
classroom; however, it is sometimes worth reviewing the effectiveness of
these strategies and also adding some perhaps forgotten ones to your
list.
It is also quite easy to fall
into the trap of using, or attempting to use, strategies which either do
not work, or have long ago lost their impact. A typical example of this
is the school that uses detentions as a strategy. When staff were asked
if they used the strategy, the reply was a very firm: ‘Yes!’ During one
week a member of staff issued 17 detentions to a variety of pupils. All
detentions were logged, parents were informed, rooms were allocated and
staff were scheduled for supervision. By the end of the following week,
only five of the pupils had actually turned up for their detentions,
which then led to further actions and more staff time being used but no
change in the day-to-day behaviour of the named pupils. In fact, the
message that some pupils had not turned up for detention had a major
impact on the behaviour of others!
Detention is a perfectly
acceptable response to some behaviours, but if it is failing to change
behaviour and is causing stress and more work for staff, it’s time to
review, modify or dispense with this approach.
Use the reminders list of the
top 20 strategies to review your own techniques and school procedures,
and consider adding some you feel comfortable with to your toolbox.
Practical Tips
1. Voice matching: Your
voice should be at the volume and intonation you expect from the pupil.
A loud and aggressive voice will usually result in a loud and
aggressive response.
2. Self-calm: Practice all your self-calming skills. Remember that the first person who needs to calm down in a confrontation is you!
3. Move in: If you are speaking to an individual
pupil, don’t shout across the room or remain rooted behind your desk;
move in. Be aware of your speed of approach!
4. Move out: Once
you have spoken to the pupil, the temptation is to remain close by,
waiting for compliance. You are far more likely to see success if you
move away, expecting compliance. This enables the pupil to make a good
choice without the stress of your presence.
5. Personal space: For
most of us, personal space is approximately the radius of an
outstretched arm; any further away, and it is difficult to work out who
is being spoken to. Any closer and you begin to invade intimate space.
If you need to be that close, consider standing slightly sideways and
avoid a confrontational manner.
6. Hurdle help: Use
positive posters as rule reminders (written and illustrated) to help
pupils overcome the hurdles that prevent them from complying with your
rules and expectations.
7. Positive ethos: Set
a positive ethos in your classroom from the outset. Be on time, be
prepared and concentrate initially on the pupils who are on-task and
complying with the classroom guidelines.
8. Proximity: This
is similar to personal space — remember that simply standing near the
off-task pupil will be sufficient to make them consider their behaviour.
9. Proximity praise: Rather
than giving random praise, spot the off-task pupil and make sure you
praise the pupil nearby who is on task and complying. This is far more
positive than simply noting the wrong behaviour.
10. Non-verbal language: Be aware that more than 60% of all communication is non-verbal. What is your body language saying?
11. Antiseptic bounce: This
is a classic strategy. Send the target pupil to a colleague with a note
or message. The note says, ‘Tell (pupil’s name) “Well done” and send
him or her back!’ The pupil has been removed from the problem situation,
received praise and has returned in a fresh state of mind.
12. Meet and greet: Some
pupils are simply not in the right frame of mind at the start of the
day or the lesson. Set up a system with you or a TA to meet and greet
and settle the pupil.
13. Track behaviours: It is vital that you have an accurate and objective system for tracking, monitoring and evaluating behaviour.
14. Refocus: Don’t be verbally misled by arguing pupils. Refocus them on the issue by using a statement of understanding (‘Yes, I see, but that is not the point; you need to…‘)
15. Broken record: Avoid
engaging in an argument, and be prepared to repeat your instruction or
direction up to three times (use the exact same wording) before raising
the level of your response
16. Time out/Change seat: A change of environment will often help to focus a pupil. Don’t forget, the emphasis should be on time. Make sure you have a plan of how to reintegrate the pupil back into your teaching group.
17. Think sheet/Self-review: A simple process to enable the pupil to reconsider their actions and to decide on a more appropriate course of action next time.
18. Rules/Rewards/Consequences: Involve pupils in the development of rules.
19. Hierarchy of response: Have
at least five levels of response and remember that your role is to use
the responses to keep the pupil at the lowest level possible; not to
escalate the problem!
20. Communicate: Make
sure that you have systems in place to enable the sharing of
information with parents, other staff and the named pupil. It is easy to
determine ‘hot spots’, problem lessons, personality clashes and how
different adults perceive the pupil if information is shared.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)